You filled out a questionnaire, fed it into the machine, and almost instantly received a card with the name and address of a like-minded participant in some far-flung locale—your ideal match. He called up his friend Robert Ross, a programmer at I. M., and they began considering ways to adapt this approach to find matches closer to home. “This loser happens to be a talented fashion illustrator for one of New York’s largest advertising agencies.They’d heard about some students at Harvard who’d come up with a program called Operation Match, which used a computer to find dates for people. She makes Quiche Lorraine, plays chess, and like me she loves to ski. ”One day, a woman named Patricia Lahrmer, from 1010 WINS, a local radio station, came to to do an interview.Some add an extra layer of projection and interpretation; they adhere to a certain theory of compatibility, rooted in psychology or brain chemistry or genetic coding, or they define themselves by other, more readily obvious indicators of similitude, such as race, religion, sexual predilection, sense of humor, or musical taste.There are those which basically allow you to browse through profiles as you would boxes of cereal on a shelf in the store.As much as it may have evolved, in the human animal, as a motivation system for mate-finding, it was rarely given great consideration in the final reckoning of conjugal choice.The twentieth century reduced it all to smithereens.Just enter your account info for Facebook, Twitter, or another social-networking site and your page will be populated with your likes, wall posts, and photos (you can make anything private with one click).
This online dating community focuses on the specific interests and desires of people like you.They approach the primeval mystery of human attraction with a systematic and almost Promethean hand.They rely on algorithms, those often proprietary mathematical equations and processes which make it possible to perform computational feats beyond the reach of the naked brain.Happiness, self-fulfillment, “me time,” a woman’s needs: these didn’t rate.As for romantic love, it was an almost mutually exclusive category of human experience.